Videogames to an extent can be art. In the first article
what was talked about was a “rock” stage. This rock stage was where the magic
happened and where every other thing was shut out, so what is important could
be focused on and turned into something amazing. This I believe is when
videogames are art, it is when there are no people playing the game and you can
just marvel at what was created for us. This is not true for any video game;
games like “WACO” and “Grand Theft Auto” are not. Those games do not have any
purpose, argue all you want about how they are expressions of what people feel
but explain to me how the senseless murder and other bad things are art. If you
were to say those are killing games so all killing games are bad you would be
wrong, other games involving killing have purposes, reasons, and motives. When
some video games are being created it is about the game and what the creators
are trying to produce for the public. Most games up to this point should be
considered art. When you add the players into the mix, you see that video games
as art disappears. We play games and manipulate what was created and destroy
the world that was painstakingly planned out and created. What is done in video
games is not art and those who create the games know this, why else would after
everything we do in videogames it all resets. Nothing is every permanently
ruined in videogames, so what was created can be restored and brought back to
its former beauty. Lastly there are videogames that are purely for destruction
and have no purpose. Like the games I mentioned earlier and others like them. I
would argue till the gas is turned off to anyone who believes games like those
are art. As far as I am concerned people who think that those games are art
more than likely believe that Christ’s image burnt on toast belongs next to the
Mona Lisa.
No comments:
Post a Comment